Giving Back

GlobalGIving: Dafur Give a Little, Change Despair to Hope.

For a change...

Obama08_Badge1sm.jpg

Our Families Write:

We interupt...

Our Families Keep Writing:

May 16, 2008

Left to do

Well, yesterday my gay agenda was advanced tremendously.

We've made some progress on B (pass ENDA) last year, but still not there, but it's D (Marriage equality in at least 2 states and repeal of federal recognition portion of DOMA law, (Massachusetts has marriage, New York, Connecticut, California and others are considering it either legislatively, in the courts or both. DOMA repeal not yet in works.) that we've made strides by completing half of this task.

But that half needs some help still.


Getting married

Yesterday was an emotional day. Today I've had some time to think about it.

My considered, deep thoughts?

Wow.

Not much different than yesterday. This is momentous. If you read the decision, you'll see that the language is firm and clear... we are equal Californian citizens and should be treated as such.

This already has some seemingly small on our daily lives, but immediate, impacts that actually mean a tidal change. In the long run, it will have larger legal ones, but for now it's already having some large shifts in meaning and immediate effects.


It's getting hot out here

heatwave.jpeg Ouch, San Francisco and the bay area CRUSHED all previous heat records since recorded time yesterday.


It wasn't just very, very hot, the weather service said, it was "excessively hot," and the official excessive heat warning will remain in effect today.

Glad I work in a basement office today. Speaking of heat...


May 15, 2008

Wow, We're married

From THIS four years ago, came....

Several quotes from the 4-3 decision (more info here):

In light of the fundamental nature of the substantive rights embodied in the right to marry — and their central importance to an individual’s opportunity to live a happy, meaningful, and satisfying life as a full member of society — the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all individuals and couples, without regard to their sexual orientation.It is true, of course, that as an historical matter in this state marriage always has been limited to a union between a man and a woman. Tradition alone,

however, generally has not been viewed as a sufficient justification for perpetuating, without examination, the restriction or denial of a fundamental constitutional right.

and in response to the argument that marriage is for procreation exclusively (Washington State court's argument).

There is, however, no authority whatsoever to support the proposition that an individual who is physically incapable of bearing children does not possess a fundamental constitutional right to marry. Such a proposition clearly is untenable. A person who is physically incapable of bearing children still has the potential to become a parent and raise a child through adoption or through means of assisted reproduction, and the constitutional right to marry ensures the individual the opportunity to raise children in an officially recognized family with the person with whom the individual has chosen to share his or her life. Thus, although an important purpose underlying marriage may be to channel procreation into a stable family relationship, that purpose cannot be viewed as limiting the constitutional right to marry to couples who are capable of biologically producing a child together.

It appears an IMMEDIATE ruling to strike down the ban and to allow marriage immediately:

in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union “between a man and a woman” is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples. In addition, because the limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples imposed by section 308.5 can have no constitutionally permissible effect in light of the constitutional conclusions set forth in this opinion, that provision cannot stand.

So....

Plaintiffs are entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandate directing the appropriate state officials to take all actions necessary to effectuate our ruling in this case so as to ensure that county clerks and other local officials throughout the state, in performing their duty to enforce the marriage statutes in their jurisdictions, apply those provisions in a manner consistent with the decision of this court.

WE ARE MARRIED!!!!!!**

**Stay tuned though, I'm sure there will have to be some legislative work to get our DP converted.

May 14, 2008

Tomorrow: Full Equality or Remain Second Class?

It's been forever and a day since I posted. Sorry, just life (good things!). I'm not going to promise I'll post more (though I hope to), but I have to post today.

Tomorrow the California Supreme Court will rule on our relationship's legal equality. Same-sex marriage or something less.

For Guy and I it's been a long history.

In 1996 we met (though we had known each other before in college) and fell in love.

In December of 1997 we had a commitment ceremony (I used to have a web page of that, don't know where it is now :( )

In 2000, we registered as Domestic Partners in the state of California.

In 2002, we adopted our dear daughter.

In 2004, we were "married" in the San Francisco weddings instigated by Gavin Newsom (and those marriages are the ones that lead to the court case about to be decided tomorrow).

In 2005, our DP was enhanced by the legislature.

Now, in 2008 we'll see if we reach full equality. The rumors are not good. I hope they are false one.s

April 9, 2008

Happy Birthday Emma!!!

Six full orbits around the sun since the day our sweet daughter was born!

April 3, 2008

Expanding

The the process begins again, expanding our family.

Mark Twain says history doesn't necessarily repeat itself, but it does rhyme. 6 years ago we did this process before, and after a series of emotional summits and deep crevices, we added our sweet and delightful (and headstrong, and independent, and smart, and gregarious) Emma to the family.

We've been attempting to start our second adoption for a while now, but for various reasons it just didn't take. It will take this time :), we've made the steps.

Already we are getting a sense of deja vu, though there are differences.


April 1, 2008

The absurdity of it all

The military has the "DADT" (don't ask, don't tell) policy and state and federal governments have DOMA amendments and laws (DOMA for the federal government, signed, as DADT, by President Clinton). Anyway, these have lead to some sad and frustrating inequalities for military heroes who die in battle and same-sex couples trying to live their lives.

But isn't it getting just a bit absurd (well, as if inequality is ever not absurd) when the Pentagon feels it necessary to not allow the same-sex partner of a House Representative Tammy Baldwin on a flight because well.. she's of the same gender, and "the Pentagon appears to be self-conscious about transporting gay domestic partners at a time when it continues to enforce a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in its own ranks." An intersection of both DADT and DOMA inequalities to create an absurdity...

Under House guidelines, members of Congress may take their spouses with them on military flights if there is room for them and when it is “necessary for protocol purposes.” Although Baldwin, the only openly gay woman elected to Congress, exchanged wedding vows with Lauren Azar in 1998, her home state of Wisconsin does not officially recognize same-sex marriages, and military officials were apparently unwilling to consider Azar a “spouse” within the meaning of the House guidelines.

It took Nancy Pelosi's intervention to allow it. When even our national legislators are subjected to the humility of inequality, can anyone really doubt that the rest of us are subjected to such inequality on a regular basis? It's time to repeal both DADT and DOMA laws.


March 28, 2008

The other gay mormon fathers where one is a biologist

This same-sex couple (like us) with adopted kids (like us) living in Utah (like we used to) are former Mormons (like us) and one is a biologist (like us).

Yikes, it's the twilight zone :D.

March 25, 2008

Banana Bread Experiment

Every summer we spend some time in Hawaii, on the Big Island, and every year I experiment with recipes for our time in Hawaii. My criteria:

1. Ingredients have to have a local origin or _could be_ grown commercially on a local basis if there was demand.

2. Ingredients (some at least) have to have some local significance culturally. Either the recipe origins should be Hawaiian (LauLau's) or the ingredients have cultural significance (rice from immigrants, taro from Hawaiians)

3. Healthy

Last couple years I've modified an Avocado Pie to include a brown rice flour crust (though wheat does grow in Hawaii and grown commercially, I substitute rice flour instead for cultural and health reasons) and made my own version of Lau Lau to be a bit healthier than pork (chicken and local crab, w/ sweet potato).

I just started my new banana bread recipe experiment (see notes below), but version 1.1 was a hit this weekend!! :


Subscribe

Six years!

About:

On This Day:

2006:
Bean Soup
2005:
Christian? Progressive? Political?
2004:
Profoundly Joyous
2003:
reading
San Franciscans are drunken know-it-alls

Latest Comments

In "Getting married," C. L. Hanson commented
Congratulations!!! This is wonderful ne

In "It's getting hot out here," dramamama commented
I am so not ready for the summer. It's

In "Getting married," dave commented
great post, Trey. you really articulated

In "Wow, We're married," Annie commented
Congratulations, y'all!!

In "Wow, We're married," stephanie commented
Yeah!! What wonderful news. Congrats to

In "Wow, We're married," Cody commented
I saw this blog posted in the comments s

Stuff

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33